Index Medicus -national Library Of Medicine- Abbreviations For Journal Titles Today

He convened a committee: three catalogers, a medical historian from Johns Hopkins, and a frustrated cardiologist who actually used the Index Medicus every day. For six months, they argued over every slash and period. Could “New England Journal of Medicine” become N Engl J Med ? (Yes, but only if “New” was not abbreviated to N. alone—too vague.) What about “Journal of the American Medical Association” ? That became JAMA —but was that an abbreviation or a new word? (They decided it was a “title word contraction.”) And the German monster? Z Exp Med. Everyone held their breath. It fit on one line.

Dr. Cairns found her asleep at her desk the next morning, cheek pressed against the cards. He read her list. Then he said, “This is either the most brilliant or most dangerous idea in bibliographic history.” He convened a committee: three catalogers, a medical

That evening, Eleanor stayed late. She pulled a stack of 500 index cards from the catalog and began a radical experiment. She took the most frequent words in medical journal titles: Acta , Annales , Archives , Journal , Medical , Research , Surgery . Then she invented a shorthand. “Acta” became Acta (no change—it was short enough). “Annales” became Ann. “Archives” became Arch. “Journal” became J. “Medical” became Med. “Surgery” became Surg. By midnight, she had a list of forty abbreviations. (Yes, but only if “New” was not abbreviated to N

The breaking point came in the winter of 1959. A visiting professor from Heidelberg politely complained that the latest Index Medicus weighed four more pounds than the previous year’s edition. “It is not the knowledge that is heavy,” he said, “but the ink wasted on ‘Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, Section on Experimental Pathology and Therapeutics.’” (They decided it was a “title word contraction