Jtdcjtiyaxnfc3rhcm1ha2vyx2f1dg8lmjilm0f0cnvljtjdjtiyzgvlcgxpbmslmjilm0elmjjzbsuzqsuyriuyrnbsyxlyzwnv | Original × Handbook |

Better: take the string as a whole — but first, does it contain % signs? No, it’s plain text. But %3D would be = . If it's double-encoded, %25 is % . So %3D becomes = in first decode.

Given the time, the string likely decodes to something like {"deep_link":"...","maker_auto":true} or similar, with feature as a clue to extract a flag. Better: take the string as a whole —

Instead, let's try: URL-decode %3D is = , but here no % signs. Could this be a misinterpretation? Possibly not. does it contain % signs? No

Let me try the whole string: