Principles Of Distributed Database Systems Exercise Solutions Link

Derived fragmentation: fragment ORDER based on the fragmentation of CUSTOMER .

P2 is uncertain (in “ready” state).

| Time | TX | TY | |------|----|----| | t1 | Lock stock at R1, R2 (write quorum) | | | t2 | Read stock: 100, 100 | | | t3 | Write stock: 90, 90 | | | t4 | Release locks | | | t5 | | Lock price at R2, R3 (write quorum) | | t6 | | Read price: $10, $10 | | t7 | | Write price: $10.50, $10.50 | | t8 | | Release locks | Serializable order: TX then TY

Stock = 90 (on R1,R2,R3 after propagation), Price = $10.50. Serializable order: TX then TY. Note: Read quorum not used here, but for read-only transactions, read any 2 replicas to ensure freshness. 5. Distributed Recovery – Two-Phase Commit (2PC) Exercise: Coordinator C, participants P1, P2. After all vote YES, C sends COMMIT to P1 but crashes before sending to P2. P1 receives commit, commits. P2 receives nothing. What happens? How does recovery solve this? P2. After all vote YES