Two teachers can look at the same word ( compromise, consequence, tradition ) and disagree violently on whether it is Tier 2 or Tier 3. Resource 5.3 provides criteria, but not a definitive dictionary. I have watched entire PLC meetings derail over atmosphere – is it Tier 2 (academic, figurative: "classroom atmosphere") or Tier 3 (science: "Earth's atmosphere")? The answer, per 5.3, is both , but the list doesn't resolve the ambiguity.
The list assumes that if a word is Tier 3 (e.g., monarchy ), students can learn it via context. But a student who has no schema for kings, queens, or succession will flounder. Resource 5.3 needs a stronger caution: Tier 3 words that are conceptually dense should be pre-taught explicitly, even if they are low frequency. The list is slightly too rigid. resource list 5.3 of the letrs manual
ESL specialists (who need to modify the Tier 1 assumptions), and kindergarten teachers (where almost all words are Tier 1, making the list less relevant until late first grade). Two teachers can look at the same word
K-5 classroom teachers, special educators, and any middle/high school teacher in a high-poverty school where oral language gaps are wide. The answer, per 5
| Tier | Description (per LETRS 5.3) | Examples | Instructional Priority | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Basic, everyday words. Rarely need instruction for native speakers. | clock, baby, happy, run | None (except for ELLs) | | Tier 2 | High-frequency, cross-curricular academic words. Mature language users. The sweet spot . | coincidence, absurd, fortunate, analyze, establish | Highest Priority | | Tier 3 | Low-frequency, domain-specific words. Best taught in context of a lesson. | photosynthesis, isthmus, pentameter, amortization | Contextual / Just-in-time |
