The Classical Moment Problem And Some Related Questions In Analysis <DELUXE · Tricks>

For the Stieltjes problem (support on $[0,\infty)$), we need an extra condition: both the Hankel matrix of $(m_n)$ and the shifted Hankel matrix of $(m_n+1)$ must be positive semidefinite.

For the Hausdorff problem (support in $[0,1]$), the condition becomes that the sequence is : the forward differences alternate in sign. Specifically, $\Delta^k m_n \ge 0$ for all $n,k\ge 0$, where $\Delta m_n = m_n+1 - m_n$. 3. Uniqueness: The Problem of Determinacy Even if a moment sequence exists, the measure might not be unique. This is the most subtle part of the theory. For the Stieltjes problem (support on $[0,\infty)$), we

$$ \sum_i,j=0^N a_i a_j m_i+j \ge 0 $$

encodes all the moments. The measure is determinate iff the associated (a tridiagonal matrix) is essentially self-adjoint in $\ell^2$. Indeterminacy corresponds to a deficiency of self-adjoint extensions—a concept from quantum mechanics. Complex Analysis and the Stieltjes Transform Define the Stieltjes transform of $\mu$: $$ \sum_i,j=0^N a_i a_j m_i+j \ge 0 $$

For the Hamburger problem, this condition is also sufficient (a theorem of Hamburger, 1920): A sequence $(m_n)$ is a Hamburger moment sequence if and only if the Hankel matrix is positive semidefinite. is that measure unique?

$$ x P_n(x) = P_n+1(x) + a_n P_n(x) + b_n P_n-1(x) $$

We assume all moments exist (are finite). The classical moment problem asks: Given a sequence $(m_n)_n=0^\infty$, does there exist some measure $\mu$ that has these moments? If yes, is that measure unique?